Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

7

A 75 cm straight wire moves straight up through a 0.53 T magnetic field with a velocity of 16 m/s. What is the induced emf in th

e wire? O 3.18 V O 6.36 v O 4.78 V O 12.3V

2 answers:

tankabanditka [31]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

6.36

Explanation:

If a 75 cm straight wire moves straight up through a 0.53 T magnetic field with a velocity of 16 m/s, the induced emf in the wire is 6.36.

Luden [163]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Induced emf of the wire is 6.36 Volts.

Explanation:

It is given that,

Length of the wire, l = 75 cm = 0.75 m

Magnetic field, B = 0.53 T

Velocity, v = 16 m/s

The wire is moving straight up in the magnetic field. So, an emf is induced in the wire. It is given by :

$\epsilon=Blv$

$\epsilon=0.53\ T\times 0.75\ m\times 16\ m/s$

$\epsilon=6.36\ V$

So, the induced emf of the wire is 6.36 V. Hence, the correct option is (b) "6.36 V".

You might be interested in

A 34.0 %-efficient electric power plant produces 800 MW of electric power and discharges waste heat into 20∘C ocean water. Suppo

mojhsa [17]

Answer:

77647

Explanation:

$\eta$ = Efficiency = 34%

Power used in 1 home = 0.02 MW

Total power is

$P=\dfrac{800}{\eta}\\\Rightarrow P=\dfrac{800}{0.34}\\\Rightarrow P=2352.94117\ MW$

Waste of power

$2352.94117-800=1552.94117\ W$

Number of homes would be given by

$n=\dfrac{1552.94117}{0.02}=77647.0585\ homes$

The number of homes that could be heated with the waste heat of this one power plant is 77647

8 0

3 years ago

A block slides on a table pulled by a string attached to a hanging weight. In case 1 the block slides without friction and in ca

ycow [4]

The tension in the string with friction would be the biggest because of the involvement of the force of gravity. This would result in that the friction force that is acting on the system. There is no friction in the frictionless system, and only the force of gravity is relevant.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Explain the difference between what Isaac Newton and Louis de Broglie would have to say about the momentum of a particle that is

pishuonlain [190]

Answer:

Explained

Explanation:

Newton would resort to the classical mechanics and say that the momentum of the particle that is moving with a constant velocity will be given by: momentum = mass x velocity

this approach will highlight the particle nature and will not be relativistic.

De-Broglie will say that the momentum of the particle is related to its associated matter wave and the relation between them is given by:

$p = \frac{h}{\lambda}$

where \lambda = wavelength of the matter wave associated to the particle, h = planck's constant

and $p = \gamma\times mv$

thus, this highlights the wave nature of the particle and is also relativistic.

6 0

3 years ago

A ray of light passes from air into a block of clear plastic. How does the angle of incidence in the air compare to the angle of

andre [41]

Answer:

The angle of incidence is greater than the angle of refraction

Explanation:

Refraction occurs when a light wave passes through the boundary between two mediums.

When a ray of light is refracted, it changes speed and direction, according to Snell's Law:

$n_1 sin \theta_1 = n_2 sin \theta_2$

where :

$n_1$ is the index of refraction of the 1st medium

$n_2$ is the index of refraction of the 2nd medium

$\theta_1$ is the angle of incidence (the angle between the incident ray and the normal to the boundary)

$\theta_2$ is the angle of refraction (the angle between the refracted ray and the normal to the boundary)

In this problem, we have a ray of light passing from air into clear plastic. We have:

$n_1=1.00$ (index of refraction of air)

$n_2=1.50$ approx. (index of refraction in clear plastic)

Snell's Law can be rewritten as

$sin \theta_2 =\frac{n_1}{n_2}sin \theta_1$

And since $n_2>n_1$ , we have

$\frac{n_1}{n_2}$

And so

$\theta_2$

Which means that

The angle of incidence is greater than the angle of refraction

6 0

3 years ago

A copper sphere was moving at 40 m/s when it hit another object. This caused all of the KE to be converted into thermal energy f

USPshnik [31]

Answer:

Temperature increase = 2.1 [C]

Explanation:

We need to identify the initial data of the problem.

v = velocity of the copper sphere = 40 [m/s]

Cp = heat capacity = 387 [J/kg*C]

The most important data given is the fact that when the shock occurs kinetic energy is transformed into thermal energy, therefore it will have to be:

$E_{k}=Q\\ E_{k}= kinetic energy [J]\\Q=thermal energy [J]\\Re-employment values and equalizing equations\\\\\frac{1}{2} *m*v^{2}=m*C_{p}*dT \\The masses are canceled \\\\dT=\frac{v^{2}}{C_{p} *2} \\dT=2.1 [C]$

8 0

3 years ago