Explanation:
A decision under uncertainty is when there are many unknowns and no possibility of knowing what could occur in the future to alter the outcome of a decision.
The options are:
(i) The quantity of output that Dave produces (ii) The quantities of output that the other firms in the market produce (iii) The extent of collusion between Dave and the other firms in the marketa. (i) and (ii)b. (ii) and (iii)c. (iii) only d. All of the above
Answer:
d. All of the above
That is
(i) The quantity of output that Dave produces
(ii) The quantities of output that the other firms in the market produce
(iii) The extent of collusion between Dave and the other firms in the market.
Explanation:
An oligopoly is defined as an economy where there are small number of firms that cannot prevent others from having much impact in the market. These firms control the way are done with regards for price.and supply of goods and services.
So in this type of market the profit earned by Dave will depend on quantity of output produced by Dave, quantity of goods manufacturerd by other firms, and Dave's degree of collusion with other firms.
Answer:
the equivalent units of production is 250 units
Explanation:
The computation of the equivalent units of production is units under FIFO method is shown below:
= Opening inventory balance in units + additional units - ending inventory balance units
= 25 units + 275 units - 50 units
= 250 units
hence, the equivalent units of production is 250 units
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
Answer: d) whether LIRR is liable under negligence to Mrs. Palsgraf.
Explanation:
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. was a very famous case in American tort law from 1928 which deals with the issue of being liable to an unforeseen Plaintiff.
In the case, Helen Palsgraf and her daughter were at the Long Island Railroad Co. (LIRR) station platform waiting to board a train to go to the beach when two men were being assisted to enter the train by Employees of LIRR. Whilst this was happening one of the men dropped a product that detonated. This hit her and she began to stammer. She sued the railroad and won in two courts until she got to the New York Court of Appeals where she lost the case as the Judge did not believe the Issue was right.
The Issue was whether LIRR owed her a duty of care even if they could not have known that she could be harmed from helping the men.