Answer:
A price increase of 1% will reduce quantity demanded by 4%
Explanation:
If the price elasticity is 4 then, this demand is highly responsive to changes in price.
So it will decrease by more than the price increase.
we must remember that the price-elasticity is determinate like:
↓QD / ΔP = price-elasticity
if the cofficient is 4 then a 1% increase in price:
↓QD / 0.01 = 4
↓QD = 0.04
Quantity demanded will decrease by 4%
Answer:
the general welfare will be the sum of consumer surplus and producer surplus.
Explanation:
The consumer and producer surplus assessment serves to measure the overall efficiency of the market, which in turn is associated with overall well-being. An efficient market is one in which both consumers and producers have the incentive to negotiate and effect trade.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the amount he or she is willing to pay and how much he or she actually pays for the product. This surplus is positive when the amount paid is less than the amount for which the consumer would be willing to pay.
Similarly, the producer's surplus is the difference between the market price and the price at which the seller is willing to produce and sell. When the producer's surplus is positive, it means that he sells the product for a price higher than the minimum value that would stimulate him to produce.
Thus, the general welfare will be the sum of consumer surplus and producer surplus.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below;
For Year 1
Average inventory = (Beginning inventory + Ending inventory)÷ 2
= ($64,000 + $80,000) ÷ 2
= $72,000
Inventory turnover = Cost of goods sold ÷ Average inventory
= $606,000 ÷ 72,000
= 8.4 times
Days in inventory = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover ratio
= 365 ÷ 8.4
= 43.5 days
For Year 2
Average inventory = (Beginning inventory + Ending inventory) ÷ 2
= ($80,000 + $72,000) ÷ 2
= $76,000
Inventory turnover = Cost of goods sold ÷ Average inventory
= $500,800 ÷ 76,000
= 6.6 times
Days in inventory = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover ratio
= 365 ÷ 6.6
= 55.3 days
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": negligence per se.
Explanation:
Negligence per se is a concept of the United States law that finds an act to be reckless because it violates a statute. To prove negligence per se, the victim will usually show that the defendant violated the law, the act caused the kind of damage that the statute was intended to prevent, and he was a member of the protected class of the statute.
