Answer:
C) there was an offer, acceptance, and consideration
Explanation:
The doctrine of promissory estoppel requires that the following 5 elements must exist:
- The parties must anticipate that some type of legal relationship will exist between them.
- One party must have made a promise to another party.
- One party must rely on the promise made by the other party.
- The party that relied on the promise made by the other party must suffer a detriment if the promise is not fulfilled.
- Unconscionability
, in other words, there is nothing that forbids the party from performing the promise.
Answer:
my mom is my strictest parent, rip. my dad is pretty chill tho
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Economic stimulus refers to change in monetary or fiscal policies by the Federal Reserve with growth as an objective. One of the ways of implementing economic stimulus is lowering of interest rates by the Fed.
Lowering of interest rates by the Fed would have an effect on loans availed by the public. The quantity of loanable funds shall increase which would lead to lowering of interest rates charged by the banks.
In the given case, Nick stands to gain in the sense he can avail car loan at a lower rate of interest than currently offered, if he waits for Fed to implement it's new policies.
Thus, the given statement is true.
Answer:
the cost of goods sold is $5,940
Explanation:
The computation of the cost of goods sold is shown below:
As we know that
Cost of goods sold is
= beginning inventory + purchase made - ending inventory
= $4,860 + $10,080 - $9,000
= $5,940
Hence, the cost of goods sold is $5,940
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
