<span>It
is an example of the primacy effect. Primacy effect is one of the two main
components of a broader concept known as the serial position effect. The serial position
effect says that when given a list of information and later asked to recall
that information, the items at the beginning (primacy) and the items at the end
(recency) are more likely to be recalled than the items in the middle.</span>
Answer:
Please ask study related questions,mate.
Answer: D. The GPOA Trust automatically qualifies for the unlimited marital deduction because Paul's wife has a general power of appointment over the trust's assets.
Explanation:
General Power of Appointment Trust (GPOA) refers to a power of appointment which is a legally binding provision that's contained in a trust such that the beneficiary possess the authority to alter the beneficiaries of the trust.
In this case, Paul's wife possess the power of appointment to anyone on her behalf. Therefore, The GPOA Trust automatically qualifies for the unlimited marital deduction because Paul's wife has a general power of appointment over the trust's assets.
The <u>Wagner act</u>, which prohibited employers from using unfair labor practices, declared that the official policy of the u.s. government was to encourage collective bargaining.
<h3><u>What is the Wagner Act?</u></h3>
The Wagner Act, officially known as the National Labor Relations Act of 1935, is the most significant labor law passed in the United States during the 20th century. Its principal goal was to make it lawful for most workers—with the notable exception of domestic and agricultural workers—to form or join labor unions and engage in collective bargaining with their employers.
The Wagner Act, sponsored by New York's Democratic senator Robert F. Wagner, made the federal government the exclusive arbiter and regulator of labor relations. It established the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), a permanent body of three members (later expanded to five), with the authority to hear and decide labor disputes through quasi-judicial processes.
Learn more about the Wagner act with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/25970080
#SPJ4
Answer:
D)
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario John ratified the purchase by John's conduct. This means that he basically gave formal consent of the purchase by not returning it immediately and instead using the computer for several weeks, which therefore makes the purchase valid.
