Answer: because that is what the slope would look like
Step-by-step explanation:
when you graph this, you have a point at 2, 4 and 0, 8. when you go to 0, 8 and count down four so you now have to move to the right to get to 2, 4. You then move to the right 2 spaces. so, you moved (-4, 2) since this can be simplified, you then have (-2, 1) which is equal to -2. If this still doesnt make sense, go to Desmos.com and put (2,4) click the plus button then add expression then type (0,8). Count down -4 and over 2. Hope this helps
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Using either the critical value rule or the p-value rule, a conclusion can be drawn at a level of significance (alpha)
The null hypothesis: u = hypothesized mean
Alternative hypothesis: u > u0 or u < u0 for a one tailed test
Alternative hypothesis for a two tailed test: u =/ u0
To draw a conclusion by failing to reject the null hypothesis as stated then: using critical value
Observed z score > critical z score for both the one and two tailed test.
Or using p value:
P-value > alpha for a one tailed test
P-value > alpha/2 for a two tailed test
Thus, if a one-sided null hypothesis for a single mean cannot be rejected at a given significance level, then the corresponding two-sided null hypothesis will also not be rejected at the same significance level.
yes its amazing keep doing these<3
The result of the division of polynomial <em>3.23 + 8x2 + 9x + 10</em> by <em>x + 2</em> is; 3x² + 2x +5
<h3>Long division of polynomials</h3>
According to the question given;
- The result of the long division of polynomials can be evaluated as in the attached image.
By observation of the procedures in the attached image, we may conclude that the expressions (x+2) and (3x² + 2x +5) are factors of; 3x³ + 8x2 + 9x + 10
Learn more on polynomials division;
brainly.com/question/24662212
