The missing reason to complete Hector's proof is
<span>Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles Are Congruent
It's been established in the previous statement that triangle LNO and triangle PNM are congruent by the AAS Postulate.
The proof
</span>Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles Are Congruent
is comprehensive.
The distance formula is:
We are given two points in the form (x,y), so plug in the values to the distance formula:
Next we can simplify. We know that 12-12 is 0, so we can drop it from the equation, as it will not affect our answer. Also, we know that -10-15 is -25:
The square and square root cancel each other out leaving us with 25.
The answer is 25.
Answer:
56
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the area of a rectangle we have the foruma A=WxL.
But we already have the area and length so we can plug that in
5488=Wx98
Now its an algebreic expression.
SInce its multiplying we do the opposite, so we divide 98 on both sides.
98/98 crosses itself out so now its 5488/98. Which equals 56. So now our expression is W=56. To fact check we put the numbers 56 and 98 into the formula to see if we get 5488.
A=56x98
A=5488
Answer:
160 degrees
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1: A straight line is 180 degrees. So 180 - 100, is 80 degrees. as the opposite angle measurement of the 100 degree.
Step 2: An isosceles triangle has two equal angle measurements, so two of its angles are 80 degrees.
Step 3: All angles in a triangle equal 180 degrees. So add them up (we will call the missing angle, Z) 180 = 80+80+Z. which equals 180= 160+z
Step 4: Solve it. You subtract 160 from both side which comes out to 20 = Z.
Step 5: Now you have the opposite angle of X. Going back to step 1, A straight angle is 180 degrees. 180 - 20 = 160. X = 160 degrees
The answer is 94.50 so C. I hope this helped. :)
