The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
Which of the following is not a permissible circumstance under which to implement a prior restraint, under Near v. Minnesota?
a. obscene publications.
b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
c. Obstruction of military recruitment.
d. Publication of troop movement in the time of war.
Answer:
The answer is b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
Explanation:
Although it is possible for certain words to cause immense violence when used in publications, under Near v. Minnesota (a United States Supreme Court decision which declared that prior restraints on publication violated the freedom of speech and press) it is still not permissible to implement a prior restraint, even when publications use fighting words that are likely to promote immense violence.
The French did not want to free their slaves so the slaves revolted against their masters.
1. <span>Carried Out The Assembly's Laws.
2.?
3. </span><span>farmers, traders, and sailors.</span>
Answer:
b. i, and ii only
Explanation:
Soft money is the term for lightly regulated money transactions and financial campaigns. <u>It presents the financial donation which was given to the party, </u>but not for the direct promotion of a certain political candidate. Other than that, the reason for the user can be any that will result in raising the votes.
<u>One of the characteristics of soft money is that it is unregulated and without many restrictions.</u> It is different from the hard money, given for the direct promotion and advertising of the candidate.
