To find the length of the sides of this parallelogram, we just have to calculate the length of each side and then proceed to find the perimeter.
The perimeter of the parallelogram is 13 units.
<h3>Perimeter of a Parallelogram</h3>
To calculate the perimeter of a parallelogram, we need the values of the length of the sides. However, if we have the details of two opposite sides, we can find the perimeter of the parallelogram because opposite sides are equal.
The perimeter of MNOP can be calculated as
We can substitute the values into the equation and solve
The perimeter of the parallelogram is 13 units.
learn more on perimeter of a parallelogram here;
brainly.com/question/10919634
#SPJ1
Kidjov the answer I came up with for you is 792 I hope this helps
Simplify the equation.
First, distribute the 2 in the left side of the equation.
Resulting in: 2x-6 = (x-1) + 7
Second, remove the parentheses form the right side of the equation (there is nothing to distribute there).
Resulting in: x - 1 + 7
Now simplify the right side of the equation by subtracting the 1 from the 7.
Resulting in: x + 6
Our goal is to isolate the x to the left side, and the numerals to the right side.
With that in mind, add the 6 (from the right side) to both sides. This cancels out the 6 on the right side.
Resulting in: 2x = 12
Lastly, in order to fully isolate the variable (x), we divide both sides by 2.
Resulting in: x = 6
Hope this helps.
Answer:
8 = b - 1 + 8b
group like terms
8 + 1 = b + 8b
9 = 9b cus b standing alone me 1b
divide both side by 9
<u>9</u><u> </u> = <u>9</u><u>b</u>
9 9
b = 1
Answer:
The null and alternative hypotheses are:
Under the null hypothesis, the test statistic is:
Where:
is the sample mean
is the sample standard deviation
is the sample size
Now, we can find the right tailed t critical value at 0.01 significance level for df = n-1 = 10 - 1 = 9 using the t distribution table. The t critical value is given below:
Since the test statistic is less than the t critical value, we therefore, fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the people do better with the new edition.
