1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
scoundrel [369]
2 years ago
11

Can you make the area of your shape go up but the perimeter go down?

Mathematics
2 answers:
QveST [7]2 years ago
8 0
If you use a triangle as your shape it will make the perimeter smaller then your area but if you use a circle your perimeter will be more smaller then your area.
Virty [35]2 years ago
3 0
Yes,you can. 

-- If it's a rectangle, make it more square ... make the length and width
more nearly equal.

-- No matter what shape it is, make it more like a circle.  The circle
has the most possible area inside the smallest possible perimeter.
You might be interested in
A company that produces ribbon has found that the marginal cost of producing x yards of fancy ribbon is given by Upper C prime l
denis-greek [22]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

C_{(x)}=-0.00001x^{2}-0.02x+49

for x≤1400; N = 5

So, Δx = \frac{1400-0}{5} =280\\\\\int\limits^{1400}_0 {C(x)} \, dx=∑C(a + nΔx).Δx

=C(0)Δx + C(280)Δx + C(560)Δx + C(840)Δx + C(1120)Δx

= Δx[C(0) + C(280) + C(560) + C(840) + C(1120)]

= 280[49 + 42.616 + 34.664 + 25.144 + 14.056]

=280[165.48]

=46334 approx

8 0
2 years ago
What is the equation of the following line written in general form?
WINSTONCH [101]
C. 4x +5y -34=0.thats the answer hope it helps
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
2 years ago
I really don’t understand this and just need an explanation of how to do it.
sertanlavr [38]

\bf ~\hspace{12em}\left( \cfrac{2n}{-3n\cdot -2n^2} \right)^4
\\\\[-0.35em]
\rule{34em}{0.25pt}\\\\
\cfrac{2n}{-3n\cdot -2n^2}\implies \cfrac{1}{-3n}\cdot \cfrac{2n}{-2n^2}\implies \cfrac{1}{-3n}\cdot \cfrac{2n}{2n\cdot -n}\implies \cfrac{1}{-3n}\cdot \cfrac{2n}{2n}\cdot \cfrac{1}{-n}


\bf \cfrac{1}{-3n}\cdot \boxed{1}\cdot \cfrac{1}{-n}\implies \cfrac{1}{-3n\cdot -n}\implies \cfrac{1}{3n^2}
\\\\[-0.35em]
\rule{34em}{0.25pt}\\\\
\left( \cfrac{2n}{-3n\cdot -2n^2} \right)^4\implies \left( \cfrac{1}{3n^2} \right)^4\implies \stackrel{\textit{distributing the exponent}}{\cfrac{1^4}{3^4n^{2\cdot 4}}}\implies \cfrac{1}{81n^8}

7 0
2 years ago
A student conducted an experiment with a toy by cart by varying the force applied toward the right and observing the results. Th
Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

No motion in either direction

C.

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The first three terms of a Fibonacci sequence are n 3n 4n find the sixth term I FB the sequence
    15·1 answer
  • A water cup is shaped like a cone. It has a diameter of 3 inches and a slant height of 5 inches. About how many square inches of
    5·2 answers
  • A new restaurant is having advertising flyers printed. The cost to design and lay out the flyer is $300. There is an additional
    9·1 answer
  • Quadrilateral ABCD is reflected over line y as shown, resulting in quadrilateral TURS. If AD 5 in., AB = 7 in., DC = 4 in., and
    9·2 answers
  • PLS HELP PLSPLSPLS thank you!!!!
    9·2 answers
  • URGENT Write the equations of a line parallel to y = -1/3x-4 thru (6,-4)
    8·2 answers
  • Which fraction is equivalent to 4/8
    15·2 answers
  • Please help me with this one <br>​
    7·2 answers
  • Please help! I will mark as brainliest IF answer is right. &lt;3
    6·1 answer
  • What’s the inverse of f(x)=(x+3)^3-1
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!