What is the nearest whole number to 2/9?

Kelly just completed compiling a listing of her firm's accounts receivables with each invoice segregated according to the length

ivanzaharov [21]

Answer:

Aging schedule

Step-by-step explanation:

An aging schedule can be defined as a schedule that help to shows a company's or an organisation accounts receivables, ordered by their due dates in order for the company or organisation to see if their customers are paying on time reason been that AGING SCHEDULE enables account receivable to be summarized into separate or different time brackets which in turn rank the receivables based upon the days until due or the days past due.

In other word Aging schedule is a table that help to shows a summarized break down of accounts receivable into different time brackets in order for a company or an organisation to easily identify the customers that are extending the time it takes to collect your accounts receivable.

3 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!QUICK

fgiga [73]

For this case we have the following table:
X F(x)
-1 -11
0 -1
1 9
From here, we look for the function f (x).
We then have that as the equation is linear:
$y-yo = m (x-xo)
$
Where,
$m = (y2-y1) / (x2-x1)


 m = (9 - (- 1)) / (1-0)
$
$m = (9+1)/(1)

m = 10$
We choose an ordered pair:
$(xo, yo) = (0, -1)
$
Substituting values:
$y + 1 = 10 (x-0)
$
Rewriting:
$y = 10x - 1
$
Thus, the function f (x) is:
$f (x) = 10x - 1
$
On the other hand, the function g (x) is:
$g (x) = 5x +1
$
Answer:
The slope of f (x) is greater than the slope of g (x) (10> 5)
The intersection with the y axis of g (x) is greater than the intersection with the y axis of f (x) (1> -1)

6 0

3 years ago

Solve the equation. Then check your solution. - (3a + 4) = 7 Helppp

Sati [7]

Answer:

a= $-3\frac{2}{3}$ or ≈ -3.66

Step-by-step explanation:

-(3a+4)=7

-3a-4=7

Add 4 to both sides

-3a=11

Multiply both sides by -1

3a= -11

Divide both sides by 3

a= $-3\frac{2}{3}$

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

I'll give brainliest please help

faltersainse [42]

Answer:

x=15

Converse: If line x and y are parallel then angles on the same line are supplementary angles.

Step-by-step explanation:

Converse:

Let's start with the converse, so if line x and y are parallel then angles on the same line are supplementary angles. I'm not sure if that's the converse your teacher wants but my teacher taught me this.

Finding x:

Now we know that the angles are supplementary angles, that means if w add them together we get 180°. So our equation will be $10x-22+3x+7=180$ . Now we just solve it. We start by combining like terms, then adding the 15 to both sides, and lastly we divide the 13 to both sides and get...

$10x-22+3x+7=180\\13x-15=180\\13x=195\\x=15$

x=15

7 0

3 years ago

A political candidate has asked you to conduct a poll to determine what percentage of people support her. If the candidate only

Semenov [28]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

The variable of interest is:

X: Number of people that support the candidate.

You need to calculate the sample size to estimate the population proportion of supporters given a confidence level of 99% and a margin of error of 4%

The margin of error of the confidence level for the population proportion is

d= $Z_{1-\alpha /2}$ * $\sqrt{\frac{p'(1-p')}{n} }$

From this formula you have to clear the value of n:

$\frac{d}{Z_{1-\alpha /2}}$ = $\sqrt{\frac{p'(1-p')}{n} }$

$(\frac{d}{Z_{1-\alpha /2}})^2$ = $\frac{p'(1-p')}{n}$

$n*(\frac{d}{Z_{1-\alpha /2}})^2$ = $p'(1-p')$

n= $p'(1-p') * (\frac{Z_{1-\alpha/2}}{d} )^2$

$Z_{1-\alpha/2}= Z_{0.995}= 2.586$

sample proportion "p'" since there is no sample information, nor any previous information is known, you have to consider it as the "worse case scenario" and use the value of p'= 0.50

d= 0.04

$n= p'(1-p') * (\frac{Z_{1-\alpha/2}}{d} )^2= 0.5*0.5*(\frac{2.586}{0.04} )^2= 1044.9= 1045$

She has to take a sample of 1045 people to estimate the population proportion of her supporters with a confidence level of 99% and a margin of error of 4%

I hope this helps!

4 0

2 years ago