If you view states as unitary actors, you assume competing national interest groups have to work to create a unitary national interest.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The unitary entertainer presumption treats states as a solitary element that attempts to boost national interest, extensively characterized. Hence, can find the political separation between the leaders and the citizens.
(Along these lines, "national interest" could mean the states are exceptionally big-hearten). While such cleavages surely exist, they will exist at the same time with the issues and so many problems
.
Answer:
was controlled for in Study 1 using self-report measures.
UWorld is more than a practice question bank, it is an “explanation bank” that is a 1-stop learning resource where you have all the information you need to master NCLEX concepts. UWorld is the leader in online medical practice question banks with over 90% of medical students using UWorld to pass their licensing exams.
Answer:
Explanation:
<em><u>The</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>han</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>dynasty</u></em><em><u> </u></em>brought confucianism to china
People living in the 21st century have a better life quality than people who lived in previous times. The statement comes with two different views, reasons for which can be stated. Though most of us can agree with the statement.
The 21st century can be a great time to live in because of the great advancements in science and technology which have paved new ways for people as well as for the world at large, to come up with new and innovative discoveries as well as inventions. This could eventually reduce the number of problems people may have been facing earlier.
The statement can be disagreed with as well because with the advancements coming up, the quality of life is decreasing since man is becoming more and more dependent on technology. Moreover, the environment too is being impacted to a great extent.
To learn more about 21st century, click
brainly.com/question/14336631
#SPJ4
Politicians often use the divisions that are already in society as a strategy to gain political support. This is even more evident in cases like that of the United States, where racial divisions are very prominent in voting patterns.
This approach can have very negative consequences for the community. For example, it can isolate voters from races that are not very prominent or are not considered a political force. Also, it can exacerbate the divisions already existent between different racial groups. Finally, it can create separation even within a single racial group, as it can fragment the group into different political factions.