Answer:
Explanation:
The partnership agreement is silent about the payment of salaries and the division of profits and losses.
Profits should be divided based on capital invested by each
The capital investment by Gillie, Taft and Dall is 60000 : 120000 : 60000 Distribution has to be in ratio of 1:2:1
Total profits are 120,000, 1:2:1 ratio
The distribution will be Gillie $30,000, Taft $60,000 and Dall $30,000.
Answer:
The equilibrium expected rate of return is higher for Kaskin than for Quinn.
Explanation:
Option A “The equilibrium expected rate of return is higher for Kaskin than for Quinn” is more accurate because the expected return is calculated by multiplying the risk premium with beta value and then adding with risk-free return. However, if the beta value is high, then the magnitude after multiplying with the risk premium will be high. Moreover, is magnitude will be added to risk-free return to find the expected return. Thus, it can be seen that Kaskin has high beta 1.2 as compared to Quinn’s beta value 0.6. So, the Kaskin has a higher expected return.
Answer:
Volume variance $1,320 Favorable
Explanation:
The fixed overhead volume variance is the difference between the actual and budgeted production unit multiplied by the standard fixed production overhead cost per unit.
Standard fixed overhead cost per unit = $11×6 = 116
Units
Budgeted units 375
Actual units <u>395</u>
Volume variance 20
Standard fixed overhead cost <u>× $66
</u>
Volume variance <u> $1,320 Favorable</u>
Answer:
D) Shares in a brewery
Explanation:
Beer is not a durable good, and the security analyst reported non-durable goods are not going to perform well. The analyst didn't specify which non-durable goods would not perform well, but beer is the only possible option. The other three alternatives all relate to durable goods (steel, industries, home appliances).
