There are several reasons why Ted Bundy deserved the death penalty. He killed a lot of people
<h3>Reasons why the death penalty was an
adequate punishment for Ted Bundy:</h3>
- He killed a lot of people in the society.
- He was a predator.
- He raped people.
- He was a kidnapper
- He had no mercy for the people he attacked.
- He was jailed, he escaped from Jail and still killed again.
- If granted parole in years later, someone like him would still atatck innocents again.
- It was the good that the society got rid of him. People like him would always be a danger to other good people.
- The people that he killed did not deserve to die also. He was only made to tast his own medicine.
Read more on the death penalty here: brainly.com/question/509558
Judicial restraint is the political theory that says courts shouldn't, unless absolutely required, issue rulings that broaden or alter the character of existing laws.
<h3>Justiciable constraint is exercised by whom?</h3>
A jurist (judge or justice) who upholds a philosophy of restraint can be described as one who considers democracy to have intrinsic, rather than just instrumental, value, that the judiciary is indeed the least powerful of the three branches of government, and who values stability and predictability in the lawmaking process.
<h3>Why do advocates of judicial restraint assert that judges are impervious to public sentiment?</h3>
They are freed from the strain of the outer world of public opinion since they do not have to worry about being reelected. In the end, the majority may not always be correct. The fact that the Founders established appointed judges and elected legislators is not by coincidence.
Learn more about Judicial restraint: brainly.com/question/29545866
#SPJ4
Answer:
Road safety feature to alert inattentive drivers of potential danger.
Explanation:
Rumble strips, also known as sleeper lines.
Answer:
its been boring, but its raining so its making it a bit more exciting.
Explanation:
thanks for asking :)
