Answer:
A) Recruiting at community events near or on Native American reservations and from colleges located nearby
Explanation:
The approach that will yield maximum result if adopted will be for the UCA to carryout their recruitment at community events near or on Native American reservations and from colleges located nearby, by adopting this practice, more Native Americans will be reached for employment opportunities and thus giving them an edge/added chance of being employed, considering that Native Americans are relatively communal. For example, if recruitment is carried out at community events on Native American reservations, the population of Native Americans applying will be higher than any other ethnicity and thus the percentage of qualified Native Americans for the jobs compared to other ethnic groups will still be higher leading to an increase in the numbers employed.
Rating all applicants on a 100 point scale and giving the Native Americans an added 20 point will infringe on fair labour practices and besides Native Americans population are relatively communal.
Option C and D will equally infringe on fair labour practices
Answer:
A litigant who loses in a federal court of appeals, or in the highest court of a state, may file a petition for a "writ of certiorari," which is a document asking the Supreme Court to review the case. ... There are also a small number of special circumstances in which the Supreme Court is required by law to hear an appeal.
Answer:
IT DONT SHOW KNOW QUESTION
Explanation:
Answer:
The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.
Explanation:
The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers. This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions. The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage. With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.
Bro I think it's no.C
Explanation:
bcoz they are the joining words which make others understand what we want to express.
