Since it is observed that I z I = 3.464 > 1.96 it is concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.
Therefore we reject John's claim.
Here:
we can use 1 sample proportion test to check the claim of John
H₀ : p₀ = 0.4
H₁ : p₀ ≠ 0.4
Test statistic is
z = p - p₀/√p₀(1-p₀)n
Let X be the random variable denoting the number of heads.
Now p = X/n
= 8/50
= 0.16
p₀ = 0.4
1-p₀ = 1-0.4
= 0.6
z = -3.464
since it is observed that I z I = 3.464 > 1.96 it is concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.
Therefore we reject John's claim.
Learn more about Null hypothesis here:
brainly.com/question/15980493
#SPJ4
Answer:
120 minutes
Step-by-step explanation:
the total bill was $58 so we have to subtract the $40 monthly bill part to find how much extra money she paid because her call was over 200 minutes
58-40=18
Then divide the $18 by $0.15 since the $18 is the total amount of each time she was charged $0.15 for going 1 minute over 200 minutes
18÷0.15 = 120
120 is te Amount Of minutes she went over her 200 minute limit
Answer:
1. 8x + 2y = 16
Step-by-step explanation:
3x - 12y = 10
12y = 3x - 10
y = 1/4 x - 5/6 .... slope: 1/4
perpendicular line slope: -4
8x + 2y= 16
2y = -8x + 16
y = -4x + 8 .... slope: -4
Answer:
I can't answer this unless you give more information to the question.
5555555.5 × 2 = 11111111
Hope it helps!