Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
I believe the answer is B! Let me know if I am right:)
Answer:
False Statement:
B. Only II is False.
Explanation:
If the cash flow from a project is farther out, the present value will be lower, all else being equal. This is because of the time value of money. This concept states that the money you receive today is higher in value than the same amount received in the future. And if the future is father out, then the value of the money will continue to reduce in relative value based on this time value of money concept.
Answer:
The option that maximizes Maggie's taste index is 1 snack bar and 2 ice creams
Explanation:
<u>snack bar</u> <u>ice cream</u>
37 grams 65 grams
120 calories 160 calories
5 grams of fat 10 grams of fat
Maggie wants to consume up to 450 calories and 25 grams of fat, but she needs at least 120 grams of dessert per day. Ice cream taste 95, snack bars 85.
- maximize taste index = [85(37X) + 95(65Y)] / (37X + 65Y)
- 5X + 10Y ≤ 25 ⇒ CONSTRAINT 1
- 120X + 160Y ≤ 450 ⇒ CONSTRAINT 2
- 37X + 65Y ≥ 120 ⇒ CONSTRAINT 3
- X ≥ 0 ⇒ CONSTRAINT 4
- Y ≥ 0 ⇒ CONSTRAINT 5
maximum possible combinations following constraint 1, 4 AND 5:
- option 1: 1 snack bar - 2 ice creams (5 + 20 = 25)
- option 2: 2 snack bars - 1 ice cream (10 + 10 = 20)
- option 3: 3 snack bars - 1 ice cream (15 + 10 = 25)
possible combinations following constraint 2:
- option 1: 1 snack bar - 2 ice creams (120 + 320 = 440)
- option 2: 2 snack bars - 1 ice cream (240 + 160 = 400)
possible combination following constraint 3:
- option 1: 1 snack bar - 2 ice creams (37 + 130 = 167)
- option 2: 2 snack bars - 1 ice cream (74 + 65 = 139)
since we only have two possibilities, we can calculate which one generates the highest taste index
maximize taste index = [85(37X) + 95(65Y)] / (37X + 65Y)
- option 1: 1 snack bar - 2 ice creams = [85(37) + 95(130)] / (37 + 130) = (3,145 + 12,350) / 167 = 92.78
- option 2: 2 snack bars - 1 ice cream = [85(74) + 95(65)] / (74 + 65) = (6,290 + 6,175) / 139 = 89.68
Answer:
1. Accounts Payable will flow to the balance sheet because it is a liability account.
2. Accounts Receivable will flow to the balance sheet because it is an asset account.
3. Cash will flow in the balance sheet as it is an asset for the company.
4. Eddy Rosewood, Drawing will flow into Statement of owner's equity
5. Fees Earned will flow in the Income Statement
6. Supplies belong in the income statement as it is an expense account.
7. Unearned rent will flow in the balance sheet as it is a liability account.
8. Utility Expense will flow in the balance sheet as it is an expense account.
9. Wages Expense will flow in the income statement as it is an expense account.
10. Wages payable will flow in the balance sheet as it is a liability account.
