Did the federal district court determine that it had personal jurisdiction over wang huoqing?

Law

2 answers:

ohaa [14]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

true

Explanation:

Gucci America is a company in the United States of America, based in New York City, are known to be makers of things people can wear ranging from Sunglasses, handbags and shoes, etc. The company has a lot of trademarks it uses to sell their goods through their sales channels.

Incidentally, Wang Houqing, a national of the people’s republic of China, decided to make fake Gucci-like products, placed them on his websites and sold the goods according. When the US Company detected the fraudulent act by this Chinese national, they filled a lawsuit against Wang in order to stop him from using their trademarks to do business. The court, before getting into the case, had to ascertain if it had jurisdiction over Wang Huoqing. The Court later did confirm it had personal jurisdiction over Wang and later granted Gucci an injunction.

alekssr [168]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

You might be interested in

if you or your friends decide to drink you should answer option plan ahead for a ride, be the one driving, ask your friends to d

raketka [301]

Answer:

Plan ahead for a ride

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which two steps in the problem-solving process are likely to be resolved at the same time?

julia-pushkina [17]

Answer:

C! :)

Explanation:

5 0

4 years ago

PLEASE ANSWER WILL GIVE MOST BRANLIST WHO ANSWER CORRECT!!

777dan777 [17]

Can you add a picture of the article please?

4 0

3 years ago

In which case did the Supreme Court state that a seizure has occurred if the officer's conduct in conjunction with the questioni

german

Answer:

terry v. ohio

Explanation:

Terry v. Ohio, in 1968, was a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not in violation when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."

7 0

4 years ago

You are driving on a two lane highway and the vehicle behind you wants to pass. You should

Anarel [89]

Always slow down by five too ten miles per hour to make it easier for them to pass.

8 0

3 years ago