Answer: The first pair of triangles can be proven congruent by SAS.
Step-by-step explanation:
SAS postulate says that if two sides and the included angle of a triangle are equal to two sides and the included angle of another triangle, then the two triangles are said to be congruent.
In the first pair of triangles the included angle of a triangle are equal to two sides and the included angle of another triangle, therefore by SAS postulate the two triangles are said to be congruent.
In the second figure, the pair of triangles are congruent by ASA postulate not SAS.
In the third figure, the pair of triangles are not congruent by any postulate or theorem [Because there is no SSA rule].
In the fourth figure, the pair of triangles are congruent by SSS postulate not SAS.
Step-by-step explanation:
just look what happened :
every term was multiplied by a factor with the value 1 (to keep the original value) but to establish a common denominator.
a/b was multiplied by d/d, and c/d was multiplied by b/b, so that the common denominator is then bd.
so, the first answer option is correct.
although I am a bit unhappy with its phrasing.
but the other options are definitely wrong.
Answer:
120 peas in 3 pings
Step-by-step explanation:
(5x8)3
Answer: f(x)= (3/4)^x/2 —> Decay
f(x)=(4/3)^x —> Growth
f(x)=(5/6)^3x —> Decay
f(x)=(8/3)^x/3 —> Growth
f(x)=(3/2)^2x —> Growth
Step-by-step explanation: When you graph them one by one, for example, the first equation (f(x)= (3/4)^x/2), the graph would have an asymptote on the right side, meaning that it’s decaying.
Straight up explanation: if the asymptote on the graph is on the left then it is growing, but if the asymptote is on the right then it’s decaying.
Asymptote is the “line” that almost touches the x axis.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
-
-
- Plug 1/9 and 9 in:
-
I hope this helps!