Answer:
A) 26V
Explanation:
(a) the potential difference between the plates
Initial capacitance can be calculated using below expresion
C1= A ε0/ d1
Where d1= distance between = 2.70 mm= 2.70× 10^-3 m
ε0= permittivity of space= 8.85× 10^-12 Fm^-1
A= area of the plate = 7.90 cm2 = 7.90 ×10^-4 m^2
If we substitute the values we
C1= A ε0/ d1
=( 7.90 ×10^-4 × 8.85× 10^-12 )/2.70× 10^-3
C1=2.589 ×10^-12 F= 2.59 pF
Initial charge can be determined using below expresion
q1= C1 × V1
V1=2.589 ×10^-12 F
V1= voltage=7.90 V
If we substitute we have
q1= 2.589 ×10^-12 × 7.90
q1= 20.45×10^-12C
20.45 pC
Final capacitance can be calculated as
C2= A ε0/ d2
d2=8.80 mm= /8.80× 10^-3
7.90 ×10^-4 × 8.85× 10^-12 )/8.80× 10^-3
C1=0.794 ×10^-12 F= 0.794 pF
Final charge= initial charge
q2=q1 (since the battery is disconnected)
q2=q1= 20.45 pC
Final potential difference
V2= q/C2
= 20.45/0.794
= 26V
Answer:
8 colors in alphabetical order are
Black
blue
brown
Green
Orange
Pink
Purple
Yellow
Explanation:
Now
- Lower mass=Higher acceleration
- Lower Force=Lower Acceleration
Option B has lowest mass and highest force hence its correct
Answer: hope it helps you...❤❤❤❤
Explanation: If your values have dimensions like time, length, temperature, etc, then if the dimensions are not the same then the values are not the same. So a “dimensionally wrong equation” is always false and cannot represent a correct physical relation.
No, not necessarily.
For instance, Newton’s 2nd law is F=p˙ , or the sum of the applied forces on a body is equal to its time rate of change of its momentum. This is dimensionally correct, and a correct physical relation. It’s fine.
But take a look at this (incorrect) equation for the force of gravity:
F=−G(m+M)Mm√|r|3r
It has all the nice properties you’d expect: It’s dimensionally correct (assuming the standard traditional value for G ), it’s attractive, it’s symmetric in the masses, it’s inverse-square, etc. But it doesn’t correspond to a real, physical force.
It’s a counter-example to the claim that a dimensionally correct equation is necessarily a correct physical relation.
A simpler counter example is 1=2 . It is stating the equality of two dimensionless numbers. It is trivially dimensionally correct. But it is false.
Answer:
Explanation:
potential energy of water is converted into heat energy
P E = mgh = m x 9.8 x 111
= 1087.8 m .
Let rise in temperature θ
m x s x θ = heat absorbed
m x s x θ = 1087.8 m
m x 4182 x θ = 1087.8 m
θ = 0.26 degree celsius .
