Answer:
The ansewr is a barter based economy.
In a barter based economy, goods are exchanged for other goods, because no good that takes the functions of money exists (unit of account, store of value, and medium of exchange).
Barter economies can work on a limited scope, but to a larger extent, they can become inefficient, because this type of economy requires a double coincidence of wants: both parties of the transaction must desire the other party's goods.
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
<u>The following is the selling and administrative expense structure of the Fazel company for the year. According to the given information and the data:</u>
The Variable selling expenses (19730000* 3%) 591900
The Fixed Expenses
The Salaries expense 960000
The Utilities expense 365000
The Office space expense 230000
The Advertising expense 1200000
The Total Fixed expense 2755000
The Total selling & admin Expense 3346900
<u>Note:</u> the variable expense is calculated by multiplying the total sales given in the question with the percentage of the commission given
<span>C) Cash, debit $11,000; Katelyn's Capital, credit $11,000
</span>
Answer: e. To drive up market share
Explanation:
Differentiation strategies involve adding features to a good to make it stand out from the Competition. Since these features are usually beneficial, the value of the good goes up and the company selling them can charge more. This is the main way things are done in Monopolistic markets.
However, sometimes it is best to charge the same price the Competition is charging even though you have a better product. This way the company is able to capture Market Share because the consumers will believe they are getting a better value for their money. For instance, if a company was selling Toyotas at $2,000 and it's competitor was selling the same Toyota but with 2 extra tires for the same $2,000 who would you use? The Competitor most likely.
This is why a firm might want to keep prices in line with competitors.
Answer:
C. Moral hazard.
Explanation:
Moral hazard is the risk that a party has not gone into an agreement in compliance with common decency or has given deceiving data about its assets, liabilities, or credit capacity. Moral hazards can be available whenever two parties come into concurrence with each other. Each party in an agreement may have the chance to pick up from acting in opposition to the standards spread out by the agreement.
