All categories

2 years ago

Science

2 answers:

7 0

When it's moving, the head of the hammer has <em>kinetic energy</em>.

We can draw this conclusion logically from the cross-sectional dimensions
of the wood (2 x 4) and the size of the nails (16-penny).

juin [17]2 years ago

6 0

C kinetic energy. As it loses potential energy, it gain kinetic energy

You might be interested in

I need help please. I don't get how to do systems of linear equations!!!!!!!

taurus [48]

The soluition set is (-3,5) and a normal ordered pair reads (x,y). So that means 5 = [_]x-10
-Add 10 to both sides
15 = [_]x
-And we know the value of x so lets sub that in.
15 = [_](-3)
-And now we divide by -3
-5 = [_]

Next we have 3x-[_]y=-19
-Lets start this buy substituting values of x and y into the equation again.
3(-3)-[_](5)=-19
-Simplify
-9 - [_](5) = -19
-Move the (-9) by adding 9 to both sides
-[_](5) = -10
-divide by 5 = -2
-(1)[_] = -2
[_] = 2

4 0

3 years ago

Use the GCF and distribute property to express the sum as a product 20+60

kenny6666 [7]

20(1+3)

The greatest common factor between the two numbers is 20, because both numbers are divisible by 20. It cannot be any higher because 20 is one of the numbers itself. You divide this out of both numbers and put it outside the function with the use of parenthesis.

8 0

2 years ago

List all prime numbers. between 10 and 20

Leviafan [203]

B it is between 30 and 60

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

PLEASE HELP ME/ The quadrilateral shown is a rhombus. What is m∠2?

solong [7]

A: 28 is your answer

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A doctor released the results of clinical trials for a vaccine to prevent a particular disease. In these clinical trials, 200,0

CaHeK987 [17]

Answer:

1) No, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the vaccine was effective (P-value=0.104) .

The null and alternative hypothesis are:

$H_0: \pi_1-\pi_2=0\\\\H_a:\pi_1-\pi_2< 0$

being the subindex 1 for the experimental group and subindex 2 for the control group.

2) Test statistic z=-1.26

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the difference between proportions.

The claim is that the vaccine was effective.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

$H_0: \pi_1-\pi_2=0\\\\H_a:\pi_1-\pi_2< 0$

The significance level is 0.01.

The sample 1 (experimental group), of size n1=100000 has a proportion of p1=0.0002.

$p_1=X_1/n_1=21/100000=0.0002$

The sample 2 (control group), of size n2=100000 has a proportion of p2=0.0003.

$p_2=X_2/n_2=30/100000=0.0003$

The difference between proportions is (p1-p2)=-0.0001.

$p_d=p_1-p_2=0.0002-0.0003=-0.0001$

The pooled proportion, needed to calculate the standard error, is:

$p=\dfrac{X_1+X_2}{n_1+n_2}=\dfrac{21+30}{100000+100000}=\dfrac{51}{200000}=0.00026$

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

$s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_1}+\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.00026*0.99974}{100000}+\dfrac{0.00026*0.99974}{100000}}\\\\\\s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{0+0.0000000025}=\sqrt{0.0000000051}=0.000071$

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

$z=\dfrac{p_d-(\pi_1-\pi_2)}{s_{p1-p2}}=\dfrac{-0.00009-0}{0.000071}=\dfrac{-0.00009}{0.000071}=-1.26$

This test is a left-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a z-table):

$P-value=P(z$

As the P-value (0.104) is bigger than the significance level (0.01), the effect is not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the vaccine was effective.

6 0

2 years ago