Answer:
no enough evidence to draw up a conclusion
Step-by-step explanation:
Data:
let: 
= decay after 2 weeks
= decay after 16 weeks
Making the hypotheses:
Null hypothesis; 
the deviation = 0.05
the standard difference = 4
Conditions:
The normal distribution curve can be plotted on a graph and the plot shows that the distribution is a skewed distribution.
Then,
Therefore, it can be concluded that 0.1983 > 0.05. This presents our failure to reject the null hypothesis.
Thus, there is not enough evidence to conclude that polyester decays more in less than 2 weeks.
Well, first you want to figure out how many sentences Jolie has left to read. You can do that by multiplying 120 by 17 which equals 2,040. Then you have to divide 2,040 by 14. The answer to that is about 145.72 which you could just leave at about 145 minutes. And to simplify that even more you could divide by 60 and figure that 145.72 is about 2 hours and 42 minutes.
Answer:
35^67
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
- x − (5 − 3x) ≤ 2x − 1
- x - 5 + 3x ≤ 2x - 1
- 4x - 5 ≤ 2x - 1
- 4x - 2x ≤ 5 - 1
- 2x ≤ 4
- x ≤ 2 or x ∈ (- oo, 2]
The graph includes all point to the left from point 2, same point included
