Answer:
For this case we know that the fixed cost is $36.50 and the variable cost is 17% of the total amount of money customers spend, let's asusme that this variable is x. And we can create a model like this one:
Where y represent the income and x the the total amount of money customers would need to spend. For this case the value for b = 36.50 and the slope m would be 0.17 since if we convert the % into a fraction we got 0.17. So then the best option is:
D. 150 = 36.50 + 0.17x
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we know that the fixed cost is $36.50 and the variable cost is 17% of the total amount of money customers spend, let's asusme that this variable is x. And we can create a model like this one:
Where y represent the income and x the the total amount of money customers would need to spend. For this case the value for b = 36.50 and the slope would be 0.17 since if we convert the % into a fraction we got 0.17. So then the best option is:
D. 150 = 36.50 + 0.17x
45 = 3×3×5
54 = 2×3×3×3
Two number : 3,3
So, the GCD of 45,54 is 3×3= 9
Answer:
y = -x + 1
Step-by-step explanation:
We are asked to find the equation of a line parallel to
x + y = 3
Step 1: find the slope
x + y = 3
Following the equation of a line
y = mx + c
3 - x = y
-x + 3 = y
y = -x + 3
Slope m = -1
Step 2: substitute m = -1 into the equation
y - y_1 = m( x - x_1)
Using the point ( 0 , 1)
x_1 = 0
y_1 = 1
y - 1 = m( x - 0)
m = -1
y - 1 = -1 ( x - 0)
Open the bracket
y - 1 = -1x + 0
y - 1 = -x
y = -x + 1
The equation of the line is
y = -x + 1
I forgot how to do those lol
A.The triangles are similar but not congruent
Step-by-step explanation:
In a congruent traingle:
the both triangles are same in shape and size
There are five theorems to see if the triangles are congruent
and neither particularly applies here
sss: the sides are not equal
as none of the sides are equal, then despite the angles, congruence is not possible
However it is evident that one of the triangles is proportionally bigger than the other but similar. Hence A is correct.
