Answer:
yes there is a correlation
Step-by-step explanation:
here's how I found this by looking up all key words.
An easy way of finding the answer to your question is by using a scientific calculator. When I plugged in 6,000^10 it gave me 6.0466176x10^37. Yes the answer is in scientific notation, but if you want the answer shortened out to the nearest hundredth place the answer is 6.05.
Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
this is because the number is not getting multiplied by anything.
3.2 x 108 The 8 is suppose to be an exponent of 10
Answer:
-4
Step-by-step explanation:
