Answer:
Debit bad debt with $4,000, and credit Accounts receivable also with $4,000.
Explanation:
New bad written off = Accounts receivable × 4% = $100,000 × 4% = $4,000
The journal entries will be as follows:
<u>Details Dr ($) Cr ($) </u>
Bad debt 4,000
Accounts receivable 4,000
<u><em>Being a bad written off the accounts receivable </em></u>
Answer:
Bonds
Explanation:
Bonds are financial instruments that are used to obtain funding from the bond holders. It is a debt security that is issued by a government or corporation to investors.
When investors buy bonds the funds are used by governments for its operations and various projects. Interest is paid on the bonds.
Bonds can be municipal bonds or corporate bonds.
Unlike shares bonds does not grant the holder an equity or ownership stake in the company, rather it grants a creditor stake.
Answer:
$3,500
Explanation:
Placing a stop-loss order at $165 means that the last amount that the stock traded, it had a price of $165 per share.
Based on that, it is evident that each stock has lost $35 when compared to the price at which the stop-loss order was placed and the initial cost per share of $200.
Loss per share=$200-$165=$35
The loss incurred on 100 shares of IBM=loss per share*number of shares owned
The loss incurred on 100 shares of IBM=$35*100
The loss incurred on 100 shares of IBM=$3,500
Answer:
Normal good
Explanation:
Income effect Is change in quantity demanded when the consumers purchasing power change as a result of a change in real income.
Substitution effect is when quantity demanded falls as a result of rise in price of a good which leads consumers to purchase cheaper alternatives.
A normal good is a good whose demand increases as income increases.
If the price of a normal good falls, the real purchasing power of the consumer increases and the consumer buys more of the good. Also, the consumer substituites from more expensive alternative goods to the more cheap normal good. The income and substitution effect both move in the same direction.
<span>The question refers to whether that scenario describes a competitive market, and the answer is - no. This scenario that you have presented us with is not an example of a competitive market because there is no free entry. Because firms cannot freely enter this market, this cannot be said to be competitive, because there are no companies to compete if there is only one firm involved. </span>
