Answer:
dominant to
Explanation:
The answer is "dominant to".
When two things are combine or put into reaction and the result of the combinations shows mainly the constituents of one thing only surpassing the other thing, then that things which excels or is in greater proportion is said to be dominated.
Since the cross offspring of a black-eyed cat and an orange-eyed cat have black eyes, the allele for black eyes is said to be dominating the allele for orange eyes.
Thus the answer is "dominant to".
<h2>
<em>Slavery </em></h2>
<h3>
<em>Though the word "slavery" does not appear in the Constitution, the issue was central to the debates over commerce and representation. The "Three-Fifths Compromise" provided that three-fifths (60%) of enslaved people in each state would count toward congressional representation, increasing the number of Southern seats.</em></h3><h3 /><h3>
<em>Though the word "slavery" does not appear in the Constitution, the issue was central to the debates over commerce and representation. The "Three-Fifths Compromise" provided that three-fifths (60%) of enslaved people in each state would count toward congressional representation, increasing the number of Southern seats.In return, Southern states agreed to stop importing slaves from Africa by 1808. As a result, Congress assumed the power to regulate the commercial aspects of slavery.</em></h3><h3 /><h2>
<em>Representation</em></h2>
<h3>
<em>Large and small states fought over representation in Congress. Large states favored representation by population, while small states argued for equal representation by State.</em></h3><h3 /><h3>
<em>Large and small states fought over representation in Congress. Large states favored representation by population, while small states argued for equal representation by State.The "Great Compromise" allowed for both by establishing the House of Representatives, which was apportioned by populations, and the Senate which represented the states equally.</em></h3><h3 /><h3 />
<em>Hope</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>helps</em><em> </em><em>you</em><em>!</em>
Answer:
more violent than in Nigeria.
Explanation:
Both Kenya and Nigeria did not possess one uniting body that gained the most support from the people to obtain power after the War for independence.
Because of this, power vacuum was created win both countries that lead to several violent battles between different groups who want to take the power.
But In Kenya, there was one particular group that stood up because of the use of violent methods to compete for the power. It's called the Mau Mau. The Mau Mau did not hesitate to kill Kenyan citizens who refused to join their ranks and killed ten of thousands civilians in the process.
<span><span>
</span>
D)
<span>
<span>
Coca-Cola Company
</span></span></span>