Answer:
ISSUE Whether flag burning constitutes "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment. RULING Yes. REASONING (5-4) The majority of the Court, according to Justice William Brennan, agreed with Johnson and held that flag burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the First Amendment.
Explanation:
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated prohibitions on desecrating the American flag enforced in 48 of the 50 states.
Answer:
lovely.
Explanation:
is there a question supposed to be attached?
Answer: No se como hacer el cálculo
Explanation: Aún así creo que la opcion es la C
The answer is innovation. As indicated by Merton, there are five sorts of aberrance in view of these criteria: congruity, development, formality, retreatism, and resistance. Auxiliary functionalism contends that freak conduct plays a dynamic, useful part in the public eye by at last sticking distinctive populaces inside a general public.