Answer:
The question has below options:
A. The unsold cars count as inventory investment for 2017. 2018 GDP is not affected.
B.The unsold cars count as consumption spending in 2018.
C. The unsold cars count in the inventory investment category for both years and count as consumption spending in 2018.
Option B is the correct answer
Explanation:
The unsold stock of 10 cars in 2017 is classified as investment since the cost of producing them is expected to yield returns in 2018 when they have been sold.
However, the unsold stock of 2017 becomes 2018 consumption of GDP since it relates to household expenditure in 2018, as a result it is accorded such classification.
It cannot be classified as government expenditure as the government is not the one purchasing the vehicle
Also, the ten cars have nothing to do with import or export as they are trade within the domestic economy
<span>Jean Piaget was a Swiss philosopher and psychologist who introduced a theory of cognitive development like Sigmund Freud Jean thought human development can be described in stages (of course leaving the sexuality part of Freud out). The stages are:
</span>Sensorimotor. Birth through ages 18-24 months (Explorer)
Preoperational. Toddler-hood (18-24 months) through early youth (age 7)
(<span> children learn to think abstractly, understand symbolic concepts, and use language etc.)
</span>
Concrete operational. Ages 7 to 12 (Understanding complexities)
Formal operations: Pre-adulthood through adulthood (H<span>ypothetical, and theoretical reasoning)</span>
Answer:
very confused but okayyyy
Answer:
D. Losses result from peripheral or incidental transactions, and expenses result from ongoing major or central operations of the entity
Explanation:
The expenses represent the cash outlow or liabilities taken to carry out the activities to continue his operations.
While the Gains and Losses are incidental transactions or other events which are not controlled by the entity management. They aren't the outcome of the company's decisions. Thus, they could arise from changes in price of real state, equipment, tecnology breakthrough which means equipment obsolete and so on.
This is tough to answer in 3-5 sentences, and tends to also be a heavy identifier of your possible political leanings. You'll have to apologize if some of mine leak out in the response, but this is a question we debate hotly more frequently than every 4 years.
In general, international trade can help increase the GDP and overall profits for US-based corporations. However, if all we do is export, and we don't import, other countries don't look favorably upon that and may heavily tax our goods to counter this.
I believe we do need to be thoughtful about the amounts and kinds of international trade that we engage in. For example, farming is always a hotly debated issue for international trade, in part because farmers in other countries with a dramatically lower cost of living OR farmers in countries with a favorable currency rate (exchange from their currency to our dollars gives them an advantage) can undercut our farmers here in the US, many of whom are already struggling.
There are also those who are worried that when we import produce from countries that have not outlawed pesticides we know are carcinogenic, for instance, this creates not only a disadvantage for US farmers, but also for consumers who may be concerned about health issues.
As another example of this, many countries outlawed import of US beef during the Mad Cow Epidemic. We in turn also placed bans on importing beef from the UK.
These are examples of why it's important to be thoughtful about trade, but there are certainly many others, including decline in production jobs within the US that have left cities like Detroit a ghost town (this was formerly the hub of our automotive industry production).
