<span>If you are part of the government, all phishing attempts need to be taken very seriously and handled with the utmost of urgency. These attacks can disable large numbers of systems and lead to the misuse of large amounts of very sensitive data, and forwarding these attacks on to the next point of contact can make sure that they are handled properly.</span>
<span>stare decisis means a basic principle of the law whereby once a decision (a precedent) on a certain set of facts has been made</span>
Sugar and Tobacco and Indigo
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
