Its actually A. a decrease in money going to African kingdoms
Answer:D
Explanation:
Opinions in later years shifted to a different point of view from the earlier cases.
TRUE, when developing an od contract, the od process is clarified
A contract is a legally enforceable agreement that establishes, defines, and controls the mutual rights and obligations between parties. A contract usually includes a transfer of goods, services or money, or a promise to transfer at a later date. An example of a contract is a loan agreement between a car buyer and seller. An example of a contract is an agreement between two of her who wish to marry. noun.
A contract, in its simplest definition, is a legally enforceable promise. A promise can be to do something or not to do something. Execution of a contract usually requires the mutual consent of two or more people, one making the offer and the other accepting.
Learn more about contract here:brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer is: This is an example of a mixed methods design.
Explanation:
A mixed methods research design is a methodology that aims to gather and analyze both quantitative and qualitative data in order to comprehend a social phenomenon. It is based on the idea that social problems are too complex to be explain only by a quantitative or a qualitative study. In using both, the researcher can obtain a broader idea of the problem in terms of the larger population, but also, gain depth in the analysis.
Within the quantitative part of the study the research usually uses surveys, and when gathering qualitative data he can use in depth interviews, focus groups or participant observation.
Answer:
A.Relevant, but only if the crime that was committed involved the use of a blowtorch.
Explanation:
These are options for the question
A.Relevant, but only if the crime that was committed involved the use of a blowtorch.
B.Relevant, but only if the prosecution can prove that Charles Rogers and not his brother was the actual owner of the blowtorch.
C.Irrelevant, assuming the defendant can prove to the court in an offer of proof that his brother does in fact use the blowtorch for professional purposes.
D.Irrelevant, since it is not information that a person would want to know in deciding whether the defendant committed the crime.
From the question we are informed Charles Rogers who was accused of robbing a bank by breaking into the bank's vault after hours. The prosecution seeks to introduce evidence that a blowtorch was found in his garage. The defendant objects, pointing out that Rogers' brother, who shares the home with Rogers, is a professional pipe-fitter and uses the blowtorch every day for legitimate work. In this case The evidence is relevant, but only if the crime that was committed involved the use of a blowtorch. In a crime scene which is regarded as location that is been associated to the crime committed. In this scene physical evidence should be able to be provided so that investigation and persecution of those involving in the crime can be relevant and it will be easier for investigators as well as law enforcement
