Answer:
We can assume companies form country A export to country B. Country B's economy is very large and many domestic and foreign firms compete in it. High levels of competition will eventually lower the costs of products sold in a market, so the products sold in Country B have relatively low prices.
In order for foreign companies to compete in country B's market they must have low prices. So companies from country A will sell its products in country B at low prices, increasing the possibility that the price of their exports are lower than their domestic prices (prices for their own country). Therefore the chance for a dumping accusation increases.
Answer:
The correct answer is option B.
Explanation:
As people are using more tablets and fewer television sets, the demand for television sets will decline. This will cause the demand curve to shift to the left. As a result, the price level will decline.
Now, with new production technique the cost of production declines. As a result, there will be an increase in the supply as the firm will be able to produce more at the same cost. This will cause the supply curve to shift to the right. This rightward shift in the supply curve may lead to an increase or decrease in the quantity of output. It depends on the extent of change in supply.
Answer:
d. economies of scale
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this concept is known as an economy of scale. Like mentioned in the question this concept states that as a company scales their operation, the cost of each input unit decreases as their output or production increases, Thus granting the company a cost advantage. As is happening in this scenario.
Answer:
$3,484.85
Explanation:
Calculation to determine tax-equivalent value
Using this formula
Tax-equivalent value=Nont-taxable amount/(1-Tax rate)
Let plug in the formula
Tax-equivalent value=$2,300/(1-.34)
Tax-equivalent value=$2,300/.66
Tax-equivalent value=$3,484.85
Therefore A nontaxable employee benefit with a value of $2,300 would have a tax-equivalent value of:$3,484.85
The available options are:
A. No contribution can be made because the woman does not have earned income
B. A contribution of up to $6,000 is permitted, but the contribution is not tax deductible.
C. A tax deductible contribution of up to $7,000 is permitted
D. A tax deductible contribution of up to $9,000 is permitted
Answer:
No contribution can be made because the woman does not have earned income
Explanation:
Unlike in the previous years before 2019, concerning divorce agreements, alimony is now declared to be no longer deductible by the payor and at the same time is considered to be a tax-free income to the recipient. In essence, this indicates that alimony is no longer qualifies as earned income and therefore, cannot be utilized to fund an Individual Retirement Account.
Hence, in this case, since it is , year 2020, the correct answer is "No contribution can be made because the woman does not have earned income."
