Han applies option c- he is challenging the credibility of sources. Ramona ,surprised, asks him if the evidence from Pettit's book was from fictional sources. Hans supports his claim through a review of Giovanni Fiorini's book. The material from this book which had been written by a story-teller and not by a historian was used by Pettit.
Option a- is wrong. Hans is not determining new research goals. He is questioning the credibility of sources.
Option b-is wrong. Hans is evaluating what an author said about Giovanni Fiorini's book. The material from this 'great' source was used by Pettit in <em>his </em>book.
Option d is wrong. Ramona is asking clarifying questions. She wants Hans to justify his claim. This states that the credibility of sources can be questioned.
Her essay is the persuasive type of essay. Hope I was of any help!
In Act IV, scene I, Macbeth tries to demonstrate his ambition to the witches.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Macbeth wishes to take up the throne and believes he would be the next king. In Act IV, scene I, Macbeth tries to demonstrate his ambition to the witches.
The witches show him who is going to be the next king through three prophecies. Through the sign of 'armed men', 'bloody child' and 'baby with a crown on the head' shows him that it was the sons of Banquo who was going to be the next king of Scotland.
With a mental state of ambition, Macbeth tries to plan a murder plot of Macduff's wide and children. Once an idea was sowed that Macbeth would become a king, ambitious gets him to attain it and push him to tragedy.
