<u>Answer:</u>
Option(a)
Matters that require action of both the House and Senate, but do not require the power of law or the signature of the President are called concurrent resolutions.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Concurrent resolutions require both house approval before being passed. It is used to amend or make laws that carry the interest of both the house.
They are appointed special letters like “H.Con.Res” and a unique number. Therefore it states that the signature of president is not required for the matters.
"many" for the first one and "control" for the second blank. sorry if it's incorrect
<span>What type of power does the constitution grant to the supreme court?
C)Judicial power
Which are examples of judicial restraint in the supreme Court ? Select all the apply
C)The court uses previous cases as examples of what to follow in their verdict
D)The court decides that the law must be rewritten to provide civil liberities for all**
</span>
Personally speaking, I believe that if Talbot opened the article by presenting some historical background, the article would not engage the typical reader. This is because a lot of people find historical information uninteresting. Her opening in Paragraph 1, "Daniel Kennedy
remembers when he still thought that valedictorians were a good thing", is much better because it gives her the chance to engage more readers, more so because they probably have remembered
the fight for the title Valedictorian, or they have even been involved in it.