Answer: it would be c and d
Explanation: hope this helps
The author's literary style could be described as both casual and lyrical, and has the first person narrative style.
Yann Martel's Life of Pi is about the story of a young boy's survival journey aboard a lifeboat over a period of months and confined along with a Bengal tiger. The writing the author used was considered to be both casual and lyrical which is hard to pull off together. The writing style basically means the way the author chooses to tell his story through word choice, sentence structure, and voice to fit into the purpose of the story, martel choose for going with uncomplicated and casual language to order to tell the story, and the word choice is straightforward and simple.
Secondly, he chose the omniscient narrator, in order the narrate the novel, the omniscient narrator knows and tells the inner thoughts of the story's characters, which is also called the first person narrative style which is different from second person narrator, where the narrator writes to a person or people, sometimes even to the reader.
To know more about literary style refer to the link brainly.com/question/1377623?referrer=searchResults.
#SPJ4
character vs. character, because his father's words cause him to question his actionscharacter vs. nature, because he must battle the elements of weathercharacter vs. self, because he is struggling to understand how the gods livedcharacter vs. society, because he must battle against the teachings of the gods
character vs. self, because he is struggling to understand how the gods lived
Answer: Option 3.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the field of literature, a conflict is a struggle that takes place between two different forces. It can be one side of the character with the other side of the character or between two people and so on.
In the lesson "By the waters of Babylon" the conflict and the struggle is between the character and the self. The sentence that is an evidence of this conflict is "I do not understand"they had ways"I wish that I knew".
Answer:
She could be a mentor or make commentary on Shakespeare's play, including both Lady Macbeth and Macbeth himself struggling with their moral codes and having small psychotic breakdowns, some bigger than others (Lady M literally dies).
Honestly that last one is a little tricky. She wants to help Macbeth, essentially by destroying him. Maybe that's what your teacher means? She's very confident and has a sort of complex that she controls fate, while criticizing Macbeth for his over-confidence. She says some paradoxical things and so do the witches, such as the phrase "when the battle's lost and won" meaning, technically that they both won and lost the battle, a paradox. Of course, it means the actual loss comes from casualty, but grammatically it is a paradox. Macbeth doesn't really have a clue what it means.
Explanation:
I'm sorry I could not be so definite. I love Macbeth and even performed in it two years ago. These questions are a little strange. Ha-ha! Hope this helped in some way anyhow.
