Just by looking at it, 2 seems to be the correct answer. I mean if you think about it, when the triangle is split in two smaller triangles, side LN is longer than LP so that means x needs to be a small number. I could either be 2 or 1. Well if you look at the big picture, side LM is longer than LN so it’s gonna need to be bigger. If you say x=1 then you are saying 2(1) +4 = 6 (therefore LM is 6) but if you say x=2 then you are saying 2(2) +4 = 8 which makes more sense
If x=2 then you can use the Pythagorean’s theorem
a2 + b2 = c2
4^2 + b^2 = 5^2
16 + b^2 = 25
25-16= 9
b^2= 9
b= 3
Now that we know what NP is we can do Pythagorean’s theorem to figure out what side LP is (we already know it but you can do it again to check lol)
So the answer is 2
Do u have an attachment maybe??
C
..................................
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a) The domain is R- all real numbers.
b) The domain is R- all real numbers.
c) we need

So the domain is R\{-2, 2}
d)
we need

So the domain is R\{-2, 1}
e)
we need: x-1>0 or x> 1
So the domain is (1,+∞)
Well, notice the composite is really just 4 triangles atop sitting on top of 4 rectangles, and all of them area stacked up at the edges.
so, for the rectangle's sides,
front and back are two 6x3 rectangles
left and right are two 6x3 rectangles
the bottom part is a 6x6 rectangle
now, we don't include the 6x6 rectangle that's touching the triangles, because that's inside area, and is not SURFACE area, so we nevermind that one.
now, the triangles are just four triangles with a base of 6, and a height of 4, in red noted there.
so, just get the area of all those rectangles and the triangles, sum them up and that's the
surface area of the composite,