The answer is:
Engels edited Marx's The Condition of the Working Class in England.
Her inference that the African American student was more likely to start the fight is an example of <u>stereotyping</u> whereas her behavior of suspending that student but not the other one is an example of <u>discrimination.</u>
Stereotyping simply refers to the generalized belief about a particular group of people. Discrimination is the act of making unjustified distinctions about a particular group of people.
Since she stated that the African American student was more likely to start the fight, this is an example of stereotyping and the fact that she only suspended one student is discrimination.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25523223
Answer:
Three of the world's major religions -- the monotheist traditions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam -- were all born in the Middle East and are all inextricably linked to one another. Christianity was born from within the Jewish tradition, and Islam developed from both Christianity and Judaism.
Explanation:
Government borrowing and high tariffs are a source of income for the government, and sometimes the government needs money right now rather than in the future (which is what would happen if the economy got stronger: more money in the future.
For example, if the government wants to pay for medical expenses of some part of the population, they will need the money immediately and thus will need to borrow it.
Answer: the contestants and observers thought the questioners were more knowledgeable than the contestants.
Explanation: Ross et al published a paper in the journal of personality and social psychology in 1977 titled
"Social Roles, Social Control, and Biases in Social-Perception Processes". They demonstrated that our actions and perceptions are determined by roles we have to play in interpersonal encounters; this is the biasing effect social roles have on performance.
In this instance the observers and the contestants perceived the questioners as having superior knowledge as the questioners were given latitude in how they frame the questions. Due to their social roles, the questioners were "the powerful" while the contestants and observers were "the powerless" playing out their roles and not taking into account the biasing effect.
If the roles were switched around, the outcome would still be the same with each group irrespective of their actual ability and knowledge.
