Answer:
The Kelo case proved to be a revelation for many New Londoners about their property rights. Small business owners like me have to be especially careful to avoid falling under the radar of government development projects.
Until now, I was under the impression that eminent domain gave the government the right to take private property as long as it was for public use. My assumption included that public use defined anything that the public could literally use. Apparently, the court went with a broader interpretation of public use under which “a taking is constitutional if it serves a public purpose” (Kelo v. City of New London).
This interpretation means public use includes anything that is deemed as fit for public purpose, even though I or most citizens may not be able to directly use it. This raises the concern of what all could fall under public use. I trust that the government won’t go on seizing private properties for its unrestrained use. However, the Kelo case still proves to be a matter of concern for me.
Although the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution provides a certain safeguard, the wider interpretation of public use makes it easier for businesses like mine to lose ownership of their property to the government.
Explanation:
I·den·ti·ty
/ˌīˈden(t)ədē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
the fact of being who or what a person or thing is.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Listeners tend to distrust speakers who do not seem credible. For this reason, any speech you give should be very well designed and studied so that you can speak with confidence and true information in order to give credibility to the audience listening to your speech. When the speech is credible, listeners will not distrust but trust their words.
<span>Due to the size of many populations around the world, as well as the self-interests of many corporate elites and government decision-makers, few pure economies exist as a result of these external forces that alter the pure theory that many economic strategies are based.</span>
