Im pretty sure the answer is A but somebody check me if im wrong
They built aqueducts that retrieved water from the mountains
People often behaves in odd ways due to some medical conditions. Higgins is most likely suffering from schizophrenia.
- Schizophrenia is simply known to be an extreme form of mental disorder in which a person do interpret reality in an abnormal way.
It can bring about some mix-up of hallucinations, delusions, and high disordered thinking and behavior that hinders daily functioning. It can be monitored medically.
Learn more from
brainly.com/question/5248543
Or people based on common features,traits o rcharacteris
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
