Answer:
Silence/ Spiral of science theory
Explanation:
In sociology, the Spiral of science theory refers to the fact that <u>when a minority has an opinion that is different from the one that the rest of the group have (The majority of the group), they are likely to not state the theory out loud</u> because they are afraid that they might be isolated by saying their opinion out loud, therefore, they choose to remain silent. And this tends to make the minority opinion to appear to be less prevalent than it actually is.
Therefore, the theory that suggests that people want to see themselves as holding a majority opinion and will therefore remain silent if they perceive that they hold a minority opinion. This tends to make the minority opinion appear to be less prevalent than it is is the Spiral of science theory.
<span>This is true. When learning about other cultures, it is important to understand that concepts that might be benign or even positive in one culture may be taken completely differently in another. They may be seen as instigation or offensive, and the communication could break down completely from there.</span>
Answer:
"Operations Security (OPSEC)
" is the correct approach.
Explanation:
- OPSEC becomes a threat analysis mechanism that induces administrators to look at procedures from another adversary's perspectives to defend confidential knowledge from dropping through the incorrect hands.
- However, if the intelligence obtained is not protected under OPSEC, it may offer an opportunity towards an opponent or certain another adversary.
This question really depends on the individual, their culture and where they live. For example, the understanding of human rights is likely high in Scandinavia, where the life standards and the level of education is high.
However, in countries struggling with low literacy, the awareness of individual rights is likely low.
Answer:
Explanation:
In Dred Scott v. Sandford (argued 1856 -- decided 1857), the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories. Finally, the Court declared that the rights of slaveowners were constitutionally protected by the Fifth Amendment because slaves were categorized as property.
