Answer: <em>Oligopolistic Competition</em>
Explanation:
Here, in this particular case we can state that the competition that persists in this scenario is <em>Oligopolistic Competition. </em>It is referred to as the situation in a market under which there tend to be only few sellers that further sell a differentiated product, here the seller tends to have higher percentage of market control and thus they further cannot allow themselves to disregard the conduct of other sellers.
Answer:
Losses for the producers of Waterworld, if they finished the movie would be <u>$50 million</u>. If they did not finish the movie, losses would be <u>$130 million.</u>
Explanation:
This is because, the difference between all their expenses in making the movie and the revenue generated is actually <em>$50 million</em>. This happens to be their losses while on the other-hand, if they didn't finish making the movie, it would be <em>$130 million </em>(aside the cost spent in finishing the movie after rebuilding the set)
Answer:
Hello.
Explanation:
True brain discharge >>> http://mavizion.com
Answer: d) None of the above
Explanation:
The profit on the sale is not a referral fee as Joanna did not facilitate a transaction between her clients and the people she bought the products for.
It is not a commission either because it is not a percentage of the products price earned as an incentive or extra fee for selling the products.
Her selling these products is allowed.
The answer is therefore None of the Above.