Answer:
I think the answer is D, position
Answer and Explanation:
The essay entitled "The plastic problem" was published in a magazine on ecology and environment on February 27, 2019, by an unnamed author.
The essay addresses how plastic is a very important material for the development of human activities, being a very useful material and of great versatility in our society. However, plastic has been improperly disposed of and its nature is not biodegradable, which means that plastic, when thrown in natural environments, promotes pollution that extends for years on end, causing serious problems to fauna and flora Of region. Thus, the author reinforces the idea that plastic must evolve together with the evolution of society and the need that the planet presents. The author shows how the planet needs to be preserved, as well as all the natural resources it has. In this way, it is necessary to take action on the plastic.
Interesting. You did not describe the requirements, but the message seems good to me. Thanks for sharing.
It has been frequently and rightly remarked that the Crito is unique among
Plato’s dialogues insofar as its primary concern is what Socrates ought to do.
2
Most interpreters assume that Socrates ought to do what seems best to his reason (Cr 46b3-6); thus, most interpretations defend the rationality of obedience
or disobedience. On my account, it is not at all obvious that Socrates ought to
do what seems best to his reason. On my account, Socrates does not do what
seems best to his reason because he does not reason about whether he should
obey the laws; he simply obeys the laws. Doubtless, this claim seems counterintuitive to many; after all, does not Socrates articulate and defend his reasons
for remaining in prison from 49c to 54c? Is it not the cogency of Socrates’ reasons
for remaining in prison that have been so thoroughly debated in the scholarship summarized below? My answer to both of these questions is ‘no.’ Perhaps
counter-intuitively I claim that the reasons for remaining in prison, from Crito
49c to54c, are not Socrates’ reasons; they are the arguments of the speaking laws
of Athens
