Answer:
if foreign investment fell by 100% it would be totally eliminated, so it not possible for it to fall by more than 100%
Explanation:
Since in the question it is given that reduction of the western investment for the third world countries consist that foreign investment falls by 350% for the year 1990s
So if we go through the options, the wrong statement is the last one as it shows that the foreign investment fall by 100% i.e to be fully eliminated
Hence the other options are wrong
Engenuity said to have
1. Option A is not the best choice, because the monthly payments will be too high.
2. Option B is not a good choice, because it requires too high of an up-front cost, and the mileage restriction might be a problem.
3. Option C is the best choice for my budget, and it will allow me to own a car outright once the loan is repaid.
Answer:
<u><em>But where do we go from here? </em></u>
It depends on the result of more government intervention on quality life standards.
<u><em>Do we need less or more government involvement? </em></u>
It depends on the problems that need to be addressed. For example, to address problems such inequality it is mandatory that the government gets involve and create laws to prevent it. But surely for more movement of capitals there is no need of higher government involvement.
<u><em>Is it a question of the quality of that involvement? </em></u>
Yes. If government has an effective involvement there is even desirable to have its intervention but if it complicates everything then is repeled.
<u><em>Could it be smarter rather than just less? </em></u>
Yes, because it is proved that the economy acts in an effective way to good policy making.
<u><em>How can the cost of government involvement decrease?</em></u>
In this aspect it is important to mention the environmental issues in nowadasy economy. If the measurement of what is defined as "cost" is understand in the long run as conservation and balance between nature and economic explotation of resources.
Answer: The correct answer is "Focus on congratulating the team using each individual’s name and use a more formal tone.".
Explanation: In order for the message to be more appropriate both for a subordinate and for other subordinates, the team and each individual subject should be congratulated with their own name so that they feel part of it and feel that their work is important for the team always in a formal tone that maintains respect among all.
