<span>251×263=66013, which is proof 66013 is not a prime.</span>
Answer:
A) -1
Step-by-step explanation:

We can rewrite 2√5 - 3 as -(3 + 2√5)
Therefore,

We can cancel out 3 + 2√5 both in the numerator and the denominator. So we get
= 1/-1
= -1
Answer : A) -1
Thank you.
Answer:
$7.62 per hour
Step-by-step explanation:
Since, Heather gets a raise every 3 months, in 2 years, she will get a raise 8 times (2years = 24 months, 24 divided by 3 is 8).
Now it becomes a compound growth problem. We can use the formula shown below to solve these type of problems.

Where,
- F is the future value (what we want to find)
- P is the present rate ($6.5)
- r is the rate of growth, in decimal (2% growth means 0.02)
- t is the time frame, number of times compounding occurs (for our case we have figured it to be 8)
<u>Now plugging in all the info, we get the value of F:</u>

Thus, after 2 years, Heather's hourly rate will be $7.62
Y=9x because if you divided y by x all the numbers will equal to 9 which is proportional
Fit Fast: a set feet per class => y = Ax
Stepping Up: a monthly fee plus an additioal fee per class => h = Bx + C
You can discard the second and the fourth systems because they do not have the form established from the statement.
The first system produce an obvious result given that is represents an option that is always better than the other 5.5x will be lower than 7.5x + 10 for any positive value of x, and so there is no need to make any comparission.
The third system is
y = 7.5x and y = 5.5x + 10 which need to be solved to determine when one rate is more convenient than the other.
Answer: y = 7.5x and y = 5..5x + 10