<span>Let makes the table neater. event D= 100m, even E=800m
(Event D) (Event E)
A won the race (Event A) 30 50
B won the race (Event B) 60 25
A and B tied (Event T) 10 25</span>
B did not win the race today. What length of the race was it more likely to have been? The question is asking in what event did the chance of B did not win(lose + ties) is more likely. Then, you need to determine the chance for B did not win <span>in both race.
Chance of B </span>did not win <span>100-m= 30+10/10=40%
</span>Chance of B did not win 800-m= 50+25/10=75%
The difference would be 75%-40%=35% more likely to lose 800-m race
The original statement is true by the definition of what constitutes a right angle. It's simply set up this way.
The contrapositive would be the statement "if the angle does not measure 90 degrees, then the angle is not a right angle" which is also a true statement. Example: a 37 degree angle is not a right angle.
Note: the original conditional "If P, then Q" would have the contrapositive be in the form "If not Q, then not P". We flip P and Q, and stick "not"s in front of both parts.
So this is why the answer is choice D
Answer:
zbxbxbdndnzvx। dvdbdbbdbdhdb
Step-by-step explanation:
bdbd ਬਰ vggvtbrbdbdbdnnsnsnsnsjsjxhxhhcbcbbvbvvvbcbvbvbvvvvbhrhdhfbbcbcbcbbcbcbfbcbbbfbfbbfbfhffhffhffhhgfhfhfhfbbbdhdgdtyymnhdgtjnbzbbhhtdyrggfghhhghghjjjjghgffਨ bbbbbbbbbbbnnbbsbsbsbbsbsbsbssbsbbsssbsbbdb
Answer:
7.5
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
125 is vertically opposite to the interior angle of triangle
then X+40+X+31+125=180(sum of angle of triangle is 180)
the we get X= -22
