Answer:
Total weekly pay of August = = $ 1468.75
Explanation:
Annual salary = $30,000
Monthly Salary = $ 30,000/12= $ 2500
Salary for 40 hours * ( 4 weeks) = 160 hours = $ 2500
Salary for 1 hour= $ 2500/160= $ 15.625= $ 15.63
He worked additional 4 hours so pay for four hours is = 4 * 15.63= $ 62.5
But as he is a non exempt employee he is entitled to get 1.5 times higher than normal pay for over time so
he will be paid $ 62.5 * 1.5= $ 93.75 for over time
Commission on Sales = 3 % of $25,000
= $ 750
Weekly pay= $ 2500/4= $ 625
Total weekly pay of August = Weekly pay + Commission + Overtime
= $ 625 + $ 750 + $ 93.75
= $ 1468.75
Answer:
The adjustment at month-end is :
Supplies Expense $400 (debit)
Supplies $400 (credit)
Explanation:
The Supplies Account is an asset Account that decreases as the supplies are used in the business.
The use of supplies prompts the recognition of an <em>expense</em> and de-recognition of an <em>asset</em> as follows :
<em>Supplies Expense $400 (debit)</em>
<em>Supplies $400 (credit)</em>
Answer:
- <u><em>D. It has both good and bad effects, but we can't always predict what those are.</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
Explanation:
Of course, ethics mandates that the target of science and <em>new technology </em>should always pursue the good for humans; nevertheless, since time immemorial man has developed technology to make war. Thus, definetely, the first statement <em>"A It always does good for human"</em> is false.
Some other negative effects of <em>new technology</em>, like cars and nuclear power, have been harmful to the environment, but you cannot tell that this has always been so. Technology has also been developed to help the environment. For instance, panels to use solar energy do not harm the environment and seek to reduce fuel burning to help the environment. Thus, option <em>B, "It always ends up doing harm to the environment"</em> is false too.
Some of the damage that new technology can produce are not predicted both because the technology is new and because it may be used with different goals to those it was developed. This explains why option <em>C, It has many bad effects</em>, is false, and option <em>D, "It has both good and bad effects, but we can't always predict what those are", </em>is true.
Answer and Explanation: From the following given case or scenario, we can state that the manager is most likely to said the given because he/she thought that <em>being too critical might put Malcolm on the defensive end and thus hamper his social skills and creativity</em>. Here, in this case the manager asks the other employees not to have a critical review of Malcolm's suggestion and to avoid having an argument on his suggestion.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The consumers associated the saying with the Doritos brand.
