If you mean the Boston tea party then in my opinion they did it out of extreme anger. They had pretty much nothing else they could do and thought well why not dress up as Indians and go destroy a bunch of tea. The way I'm explaining it probably sucks but to me that's how it seems.
Social structure is a complex topic and involves and revolves around the basic frameworks we usually use to describe the common ways how people bond into hierarchically structured organizations, with these being either formal or informal.
Answer:
<u>type of material used to make the club head</u>
Explanation:
<u>Independent variable: </u>In research methods, the term "independent variable" is described as a variable that is being changed or controlled by an investigator or researcher in an experiment in order to see its effects on the dependent variable as it is responsible for affecting the dependent variable directly.
<u>In the question above, the independent variable is "type of material used to make the club head".</u>
The supreme court introduced a two-part test, known as the "Sherbert" test (or balancing test) to determine whether the government was violating an individual's "free exercise" of religion.
The Sherbert test guarantees that government doesn't take unjustified activities that obstruct a man's religious flexibility. The United States court framework has embraced the Sherbert test to decide whether the legislature has fittingly allowed or denied joblessness benefits in light of the job one's religion had in his or her job loss.
The test causes the courts to decide whether the individual's case of having a true religious conviction is exact and if the administration's activities load a man's capacity to follow up on his or her convictions. Moreover, the test requires the administration to decide whether it has acted to the state's advantage and on the off chance that it has done as such in a way that is slightest prohibitive to a man's religion.
Louisiana State penitentiary
