Answer:
- Cal is from a low-context culture and Medina is from a high-context culture.
Explanation:
As per the given details, it can be inferred that Cal most likely belongs to a low-context culture and Medina belongs to high-context culture. The key reason for this inference is that Cal displays direct and denotative communication while Medina is connotative and conveys her message indirectly and more through gestures, facial expressions, etc. Thus, Cal is unable to infer the actual meaning of her message as he comes from a culture that believes in stating thoughts directly instead of suggesting.
Answer:
A. protection from cruel and unusual punishment
Explanation:
I saw the answer on another brainly question
It is the stage for execution or the implementation of the agreement. This stage may likewise be regarded as groundwork for the next negotiation chance. You must safeguard that you see through promises made in order to toughen the relationship and to shape trust.
Some criticisms that have been leveled at psychodynamic theories of personality are the reliance on early childhood familial experiences that come up later in life and too much emphasis on explaining how sexuality messes with behaviors.
Well the class structure was lords then samurais then farmers. How it stabilized society was it set a strict code to follow for each of the classes and they followed that. How it unified? I'm not so sure but my guess is that every person in each class fought for their power like the lords or for their land like the farmers.
