1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jolli1 [7]
3 years ago
5

Which of the following is an example of mainstreaming?

Social Studies
1 answer:
lubasha [3.4K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

C. At Cobb Middle School, students with learning disabilities are in  the same classrooms as other students.

Explanation:

A. is not the right answer. While this is an example of using more mainstream and new methods of learning, it is not what mainstreaming means in the context of education.

B. is not the right answer. Mainstreaming doesn’t have anything to do with providing lunch.

<u>C. is the right answer. In the context of education, mainstreaming means that children with special needs attend the same classes as the general population in order to defeat stigma put on these children, and to help them develop social and life skills. </u><u>This way, the children are not separated and kept in the bubble which is different from the "outside world” but are prepared to be fully functioning when leaving school. Children with special needs that attend general classes may have aid from the worker educated to help them, but they still work in the same classrooms as the rest of the students. </u><u>If children with a learning disability are attending classes as everyone else without being separated, this means they are being mainstreamed and that this is the example of mainstreaming.</u>

D. is not the correct answer. This is not what mainstreaming means, as it has nothing to do with who eats lunch with whom.

You might be interested in
List in point how Nepal to foreign relation have been improving and expanding​
katovenus [111]

Answer:

Though the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) is the government agency responsible for the conduct of foreign relations of Nepal, historically, it is the Office of Prime Minister (PMO) that has exercised the authority to formulate and conduct policies related to Nepal's foreign affairs. As a landlocked country wedged between two larger and far stronger powers, Nepal has tried to maintain good relations with both of its neighbors, People's Republic of China and Republic of India.[1] However, its relationship with India, the country with greater hegemonic power over Nepal, has seen major ups and downs in recent years. The relationship between the two countries was significantly hampered during the 2015 Nepal blockade. Where the Nepal Government accused India of the blockade, India strictly denied the allegation and said the blockade were imposed by Madheshi protesters.[2] For the most part though, Nepal has traditionally maintained a non-aligned policy and enjoys friendly relations with its neighboring countries and almost all the major countries of the world.

Constitutionally, foreign policy is to be guided by “the principles of the United Nations Charter, nonalignment, Panchsheel (five principles of peaceful coexistence), international law and the value of world peace.” In practice, foreign policy has not been directed toward projecting influence internationally but toward preserving autonomy and addressing domestic economic and security issues.

Nepal's most substantive international relations are perhaps with international economic institutions, such as the Asian Development Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation, a multilateral economic development association. Nepal also has strong bilateral relations with major providers of economic and military aid, such as France, Germany, Japan, Malaysia, South Korea, Switzerland, the United States, and particularly the United Kingdom, with whom military ties date to the nineteenth century. The country's external relations, barring relations with India and China, are primarily managed by its Ministry of Foreign Affairs while relationship with India and China, Nepal's most important partners, is still managed by the Prime Minister's Office. Nepal's relation with China has seen a major upswing in the recent years with China now becoming Nepal's 3rd largest aid donor (after the UK and Japan), and the largest source of FDI to Nepal. sorry my ans is too long

5 0
3 years ago
BRAINLIESSTTTT ASAP!!!!
Novay_Z [31]

A Bureau agent stands between armed groups of whites and freedmen in this 1868 drawing from Harper's Weekly.

The Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands, usually referred to as simply the Freedmen's Bureau,[1] was an agency of the United States Department of War to "direct such issues of provisions, clothing, and fuel, as he may deem needful for the immediate and temporary shelter and supply of destitute and suffering refugees and freedmen and their wives and children." [2]

4 0
3 years ago
Under what law/regulation is it proper to limit access to confidential business information to outside attorneys and experts, ex
Fed [463]

Answer:

Under federal case law and Rule 26(c)(7),

Explanation:

Under federal case law and Rule 26(c)(7), it is proper to limit access to confidential business information to outside attorneys and experts, excluding in-house counsel, individual parties and the corporation or partnership principals.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The largest numbers of europeans migrated to the united states primarily because of
KIM [24]

Answer:

Economic factors.

Explanation:

  • A large number of the European migrated to the America in search of the job opportunities and considered to be about 20% of the migration. While others migrated for the political stability and form 1500 to mid 20th century about 65 million left Europe.
4 0
4 years ago
How is a concurring opinion different from a dissenting opinion?
ira [324]

Answer:

A)

Explanation:

The main difference between these two terms is that a concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority. Each of which tends to ocurr often in court cases where various judges analyze and pass judgment of another judges decision on a specific case. With a concurring opinion most, if not all, judges agree with the decision that has been made but tend to give different reasons as to why they believe the decision was justified.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Sociologist Gouldner (1960) contended that the norm of reciprocity
    10·1 answer
  • This is a test question in which I thought I'd ask for ya'll help. :{
    14·1 answer
  • What kinds of decisions are involved in self-definition? Give an example of decisions you must make for yourself
    14·2 answers
  • Laurie is unable to run long distances but would like to join her friends in a kickball game. What accommodation can they make t
    15·1 answer
  • Acquiring political knowledge, listening to statements from respected public leaders, and determining what is in their own best
    8·1 answer
  • identify one important US or New Mexican tradition. Explain how this tradition represents an important idea or belief. Then, eva
    12·1 answer
  • During the formation of metamorphic rocks, what is one event that leads to increased heat?
    13·2 answers
  • Why do you suppose that jewelry was buried with the dead?
    15·2 answers
  • Suppose you had a job you did not like. If you read that the economy was in the
    9·1 answer
  • Write 10 interesting facts about the Human Heart.
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!