Answer:
Integrity vs. Despair
Explanation:
In the integrity versus despair stage if a person can look back at their life with a sense of accomplishment then the person will have integrity and not have any regrets.
If a person looks back at their life with a sense dissatisfaction then they will feel despair as it will be too late to do anything about it.
Hence, the question here is referring to the Integrity vs. Despair stage.
Answer:
The result would likely be a contraction of the economy. The GDP would probably fall or grow less.
A goverment applies contractionary fiscal policy when it reduces spending. Less government spending can reduce economic activity because spending can be a form of investment. For example, when the government spend less on building schools, roads and infraestructure, the people who build those lose their jobs, receive less income, consume less, and the economy contracts.
Contractionary monetary policy is applied by the central bank (the Federal Reserve in the United States). It would consist in reducing the amount of money available (the money supply). Less money in the economy results in higher interest rates. This creates a cycle in which banks give less loans, and investment falls. Less investment contracts the economy.
Answer:
voting
Explanation:
because we need to vote so we can have the right representative
Culture influences the daily state of society and its direction of development, while politics determines the nature and form of culture and has the function of transforming it. Therefore, politics has a decisive role in deciding which direction the culture is going to develop. Culture is the basis for shaping social normalcy and development. Politics only fundamentally changes this foundation, while culture reflects its reality and internality. Has nurtured social characters, such as nationality, people's general personality characteristics and customs and habits. However, culture and politics are influencing and interacting with each other. While politics determines culture, culture also influences politics in a subtle manner.
The reason why culture affects a society is that culture not only shapes the human nature of people in the society, but also casts people’s world outlook, outlook on life, and values; social customs and ethical morality are gradually formed in the process of cultural influence. Fixed down. In a certain sense, the sociality of a society is a concentrated expression of the social culture. Harrison believes: "Culture is the values, beliefs, and concepts shared by members of a society. These values, beliefs, and attitudes are mainly through the environment, religion, and the adoption of child-rearing practices, religious practices, education systems, media, and The historical accidental factors that were passed down from their peers were formed." The impact of culture on society is in all aspects, from the formulation and implementation of policies and laws, the formation of social ideologies and customs, and the status of interpersonal relationships, while the smaller ones involve the shaping of individual personalities and the establishment of ideological concepts. Behavioral performance and so on. In general, culture will generally affect the status, direction, and speed of a society's activities. When culture succeeds in shaping the customs of a society, then the customs and habits of this society will edify and influence people's ideas, behaviors, and personalities; therefore, there will be such things as Tocqueville. This phenomenon was said to have occurred.
The impact of culture on the path of social evolution is not only crucial to achieving the goal of reducing poverty and injustice throughout the world, it is also a key factor in foreign policy.
Key Point: "Presidential power is the power to persuade." (11) Presidents are expected to do much more than their authority allows them to do. Persuasion and bargaining are the means that presidents use to influence policy. Not only do presidents need to bargain to influence other branches of government (particularly Congress), but presidents also must bargain to influence the executive branch itself; cabinet secretaries, agency heads, and individual bureaucrats all have leverage that they can use against the president, requiring presidents to persuade even the executive branch, not merely command it.
Neustadt's conclusion is a good summary:
